შეავსე ფორმა
Logo

ISET ეკონომისტი

შეიცან მიწა შენი ან ამბავი ორი ქართული რეგიონისა
ოთხშაბათი, 12 დეკემბერი, 2012

Below are Google Maps images of two rural communities (A and B) in Georgia. Please click the image to enlarge it.

Readers of this blog are welcome to propose their answers to the following multiple-choice questions:

Q1. East or West?

a)     A is in Eastern Georgia, B in Western Georgia
b)     A is in Western Georgia, B is in Eastern Georgia
c)      Both are in the same part of Georgia

Q2. Land distribution among households

a)     Land is more equally distributed among households in A
b)     Land is more equally distributed among households in B
c)      There is no difference between A and B in terms of land distribution

Q3. Household income distribution

a)     Income is more equally distributed among households in A
b)     Income is more equally distributed among households in B
c)      There is no difference between A and B in terms of income distribution

Q4. GDP per capita

a)     GDP per capita is higher in A
b)     GDP per capita is higher in B
c)      GDP per capita is roughly equal in A and B


Given the very large share of the rural population in the total, the land is a major political economy concern for Georgia. Land privatization of the early 1990s resulted in a highly fragmented land ownership structure with most farmers receiving roughly equal plots of about 1.2ha. Over time, the process of land consolidation has brought about significant changes in the initial allocation of land, affecting agricultural productivity and income distribution.

Looking at today’s data on land cultivation, we find major differences among the various Georgian regions. Some regions went through a process of land consolidation; others are still extremely fragmented. In Adjara, for instance, all households surveyed by GeoStat in 2011 cultivated tiny plots of less than 1ha while the average was 0.3ha. Conversely, in Shida Kartli, the largest plot was about 50ha, very large by Georgian standards.

Table 1: Cultivated land and income inequality in Georgia, 2011


A TALE OF TWO GEORGIAN REGIONS

The main wine-producing region and historically the buffer (“Sakartvelos pari”) against Persia and other Moslem invaders, Kakheti (represented by rural community A) is an interesting case. To provide locals with some degree of protection against the enemy, Kakhetian villagers huddled together in dense villages surrounded by cultivated land. Demand for protection was also a cause in strengthening and sustaining the rule of local lords (tavadi) whose lands the villagers were working for much of the region’s history. The fact that Kakhetian lands remained consolidated under the lords’ control made them an easy target for expropriation by the Bolsheviks who turned Kakhetian villages and the lands around them into collective kolkhoz farms.

The kolkhoz farms were destroyed and looted in the early 1990s while the lands they occupied were divided among their individual members. However, the availability of large contiguous parcels suitable for grape growing – a very lucrative business until 2006 – quickly made Kakheti an attractive target for investors, local and domestic. As a result, Kakheti is currently the leader in land consolidation. In 2011, half of Kakhetian households owned plots smaller than 0.2ha; at the same time, a relatively large number of farmers managed to acquire or rent additional land beyond the originally allotted 1.2ha; some of the privately owned farms are really large by Georgian standards, up to 40ha. The Gini coefficient measuring inequality in cultivated land in Kakheti is 0.72, higher than in any other region.

An important point to note is that land consolidation has not brought about any visible efficiency gains at the macro level. Despite government efforts to artificially prop up grape prices in recent years, Kakheti is currently one of the poorest Georgian regions and the only one with income inequality concentrated in the rural areas.

An exactly diametrical situation is observed in Samegrelo (represented by rural community B). Local villages are spread out, with each house sitting in the middle of a fairly large plot of land – not exactly ideal from the land consolidation point of view. With ample rainfall, a soft climate, and specialization in crops that are not particularly scale-intensive, Samegrelo is the smallholder farmer paradise. While also here land consolidation was unavoidable, the largest plot included in the 2011 GeoStat survey had about 18ha. Most importantly, Samegrelo is characterized by the lowest income inequality across all Georgian regions, among both urban and rural households.

The views and analysis in this article belong solely to the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the international School of Economics at TSU (ISET) or ISET Policty Institute.
შეავსე ფორმა