Subscribe
Logo

ISET Economist Blog

Regional Integration or Transit Corridor?
Wednesday, 23 May, 2012

This research paper by Tony Venables has some interesting implications for the South Caucasus:

Better integration with a resource-rich economy is extremely valuable for the resource-poor. Remote and land-locked developing countries have very limited export potential with the external world … Regional integration enables them to earn foreign exchange via their exports to the resource-rich partner. The benefits arise as the prices of these regionally traded goods are bid up, raising wages and creating a terms of trade gain for the resource poor economy.

However, resource-rich economies lose (or at best have very modest gains) from regional integration. The terms of trade gain for the resource-poor country are, of necessity, terms of trade loss for the resource-rich economy. Added to terms of trade effects are trade creation and diversion. The resource-rich economy runs into diminishing returns as it seeks to spend its resource revenues, and trade is a way to relax this constraint. But these gains come from non-preferential opening, and regional integration leads preponderantly to trade diversion.

With a preferential trade agreement between Azerbaijan and Georgia, Azerbaijan imports from Georgia not because Georgia is the most efficient producer of tradable goods but because of Georgia’s preferential access to the Azeri market. This is great for Georgia, but Azerbaijan would be better off by shunning preferential trade agreements in favor of non-preferential ones.

The views and analysis in this article belong solely to the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the international School of Economics at TSU (ISET) or ISET Policty Institute.
Subscribe