Subscribe
Logo

Research Reports

Filter By:
Donor
  • Europe Foundation
  • Global Development Network - GDN
  • East-West Management Institute - EWMI
  • Center for Social and Economic Research - CASE
  • Association of Young Professionals in Energy of Georgia - AYPEG
  • Ecorys
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative - EPI
  • United States Agency for International Development - USAID
  • UNICEF
  • Policy, Advocacy, and Civil Society Development Project in Georgia - G-PAC
  • Asian Development Bank - ADB
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH - GIZ
  • Management System International - MSI
  • Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation - SDC
  • CARE International
  • World Bank
  • Deloitte
  • Heifer International
  • United Nations Population Fund - UNFPA
  • German Economic Team in Georgia - GET
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD
  • Good Governance Fund - GGF
  • Pricewaterhousecoopers - PwC
  • USAID Governing for Growth - G4G
  • OXFAM
  • United Nations Development Programme - UNDP
  • TBC Bank
  • Open Society Georgia Foundation - OSGF
  • HEKS/EPER
  • Market Opportunities for Livelihood Improvement in Kakheti - MOLI
  • IHK for Munich and Upper Bavaria
  • Capacity Building to the Agricultural Cooperatives Development Agency - ENPARD
  • Evoluxer S.L.
  • International Centre for Migration Policy Development - ICMPD
  • Millennium Challenge Account Georgia - MCA Georgia
  • Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia Activity - PROLoG
  • ELKANA
  • Good Governance Initiative in Georgia - GGI
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development - IFAD
  • Regional Environmental Centre for the Caucasus - REC Caucasus
  • Land O'Lake
  • US Department of Agriculture - USDA
  • CAREC Institute
  • UN Women
  • Development Alternatives Incorporated - DAI
  • USAID Economic Security Program
  • National Bank of Georgia - NBG
  • National Statistics Office of Georgia - Geostat
  • United Nations Industrial Development Organization - UNIDO
  • International Republican Institute - IRI
  • International Labour Organization - ILO
  • European Union
  • Government of Sweden/Sida
Themes
  • Macroeconomic policy
  • Agriculture & rural policy
  • Energy & environment
  • Inclusive growth
  • Private sector & competitiveness
  • Gender
  • Governance
  • Green and sustainable development
  • Media & democracy
  • Covid19
  • Regional
Author
  • Professor Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel
  • Professor David Tarr
  • Sergo Gadelia
  • Mery Julakidze
  • Givi Melkadze
  • Giorgi Mekerishvili
  • Giorgi Kelbakiani
  • Giorgi Tsutskiridze
  • Ia Vardishvili
  • Robizon Khubulashvili
  • Adam Pellillo
  • Saba Devdariani
  • Nino Mosiashvili
  • Nikoloz Pkhakadze
  • Maya Grigolia
  • Lasha Lanchava
  • Nino Doghonadze
  • Mariam Zaldastanishvili
  • Zurab Abramishvili
  • Irakli Galdava
  • Florian Biermann
  • Irakli Shalikashvili
  • Olga Azhgibetseva
  • Phatima Mamardashvili
  • Eric Livny
  • David Zhorzholiani
  • Nino Kakulia
  • Laura Manukyan
  • Irakli Barbakadze
  • Sophiko Skhirtladze
  • Irakli Kochlamazashvili
  • Levan Pavlenishvili
  • Rati Porchkhidze
  • Robert Tchaidze
  • Lasha Labadze
  • Karine Torosyan
  • Levan Tevdoradze
  • Mariam Katsadze
  • Ana Burduli
  • Davit Keshelava
  • Giorgi Mzhavanadze
  • Tamta Maridashvili
  • Mariam Tsulukidze
  • Erekle Shubitidze
  • Guram Lobzhanidze
  • Mariam Lobjanidze
  • Mariam Chachava
  • Maka Chitanava
  • Salome Deisadze
  • Ia Katsia
  • Salome Gelashvili
  • Norberto Pignatti
  • Giorgi Papava
  • Yaroslava Babych
Date From
Date To
Advocacy, Media & Communication Strategic Framework and Toolkit to Prevent Gender-biased Sex Selection (GBSS) in Georgia
07 November 2019

Gender-biased sex selection (GBSS) in favor of boys is an indicator of gender discrimination and highlights the inequality towards girls throughout many countries. Patriarchal structures reinforce a preference for sons and perpetuate a societal climate of violence and discrimination against women and girls. GBSS is moreover a symptom of the pervasive social, political, cultural, and economic injustices against women and girls.

Social Economic Policy Analysis with regard to Son Preference and GBSS - Summary
26 September 2019

This study explores the factors behind the improvements in Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) in Georgia over the last 15 years. It combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. Focus groups, in-depth interviews, and econometric analysis have highlighted the following determinants of SRB improvements: improved economic conditions, reduced poverty, increasing the economic share of the service sector (creating new job opportunities for women in banking, retail trade and other

Competitive Advantages of the Mountainous Regions of Georgia
26 September 2019

According to the Georgian socio-economic development strategy, “Georgia 2020”, the economic politics of the Georgian government is based on the following principles:

South Caucasus Trade Study
12 August 2019

In September 2015, United Nations member states adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (the “Agenda”) and seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The Agenda and the SDGs propose that countries achieve sustainable development in economic, social and environmental dimensions simultaneously.

An Overview of the Potential of Georgian Berries on the EU Market
05 August 2019

The cultivation of berries is becoming increasingly popular among farmers in Georgia. The necessity of diversification in agricultural production and opportunities in the EU market have led farmers and the state to placing greater focus on the sector.

Effectiveness of Financial Literacy Program at Schools: The Case Study of SchoolBank in Georgia
10 July 2019

People face complicated financial decisions starting from a young age. Financial mistakes made early in life can be costly. Thus, Financial literacy could play an important role in sound financial decision-making. Financial illiteracy has implications for many household behaviors. People with the lack of financial literacy participate less in the stock market (van Rooij et al. 2011), choose mutual funds with higher fees (Hastings and Tejeda- Ashton, 2008), and accumulate less retirement wealth (Behrman et al. 2010).

Subscribe