ISET

Between August 2014 and May 2015, international wheat prices declined by 18%, rice prices dropped by 14% and maize prices declined by 6% (World Bank, 2015). This decreased prices are expected to be transmitted from international to domestic consumer prices of food items (e.g., wheat flour, bread). However, there are many factors that hinder this transmission process. Several studies analyzed price transmission from international to domestic markets (e.g., Acharya et al. 2012; Götz 2008). In particular, after so called food crises of 2007–2008 and 2010–2011 many studies were focusing on the role of integration of domestic markets to international markets, the price transmission of food prices between large markets and small ones. These crises made interesting to understand and investigate the price relationships in a main food products more thoroughly. Also, to study the implications for food security and livelihoods in food-insecure countries (IFPRI, 2016).

Georgia highly depends on food imports. In particular, the share of wheat import in total wheat consumption of the country has been around 90% in recent years (GeoStat, 2016). Wheat products are the main staple foods both in rural and urban areas in Georgia. Wheat accounted for 41% of the total dietary energy supply in 2005-07. On average in 2005-09 per capita consumption of wheat and wheat products (as foods) was 150 kg/yr. Therefore, improved understanding of market integration of Georgian wheat sector is important for country’s food security.

This policy paper investigates how prices are transmitted from international wheat market to Georgia’s flour market. In particular, this research will address two research questions. First, we measure how international wheat market prices are integrated with domestic prices in Georgia. Furthermore, we conducted Engle-Granger ECM test to understand asymmetric price transmission (APT), whether the positive or negative shocks are transmitted within the same time period.

Download the policy brief presentation

Download the policy brief

 

Since September, 2014, the ISET Policy Institute has been working with the German Economic Team (GET). In May,2015 ISET-PI and GET extended their partnership and began working on a variety of policy briefs for Georgia's industrial development. These briefs will simultaneously advance research in the sector and provide the Georgian government a set of guidelines for the development of its own policy, exploring where Georgia's comparative advantages lie. The German Economic Team is a consulting group who provides advisory services to the Georgian government on economic policy and is supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy.

 

 

Policy Briefs

  • ENPARD Annual Cooperative Survey Results

    On 14 July 2017, ENPARD implementing organisation CARE and its partner ISET Policy Institute (ISET-PI), in cooperation with other ENPARD implementing partners (Oxfam, Mercy Corps, People in Need and UNDP Adjara) presented the results of ENPARD Cooperatives Survey, which assesses the performance of EU-supported cooperatives for the period 2014-2016. The results are based on the data collected by four ENPARD implementer consortia (led by CARE, Oxfam, Mercy Corps and People in Read More
  • Unlocking the Export Potential of Georgian Agriculture

    Georgia’s agri-food export is concentrated in few products and few undemanding markets, making it highly vulnerable to shocks on a small number of commodity and geographical markets. At the same time, the diversity of climatic conditions and ample water resources create significant growth and diversification potential for Georgian agriculture. Georgian conditions appear especially suitable for the production and export of high-value niche products as the land mass is small and fragmented, Read More
  • Towards Strong and Balanced Growth: Georgia’s Economic Policy Priorities in 2017-2020

    This research paper intended to supplement and complement the following economic policy strategies and plans of the Georgian government in the areas of sustainable and balanced growth: • “Georgia 2020”, a broad agenda directed at long-run growth of most economic sectors with validity beyond the 2020 date • A “4 point plan” and a broader “14 point plan” of economic reform proposals of the government announced right before and right after Read More
  • Fiscal Policy After the Parliamentary Elections

    Economic reforms announced in the run-up to the parliamentary elections in October 2016 raised concerns about whether Georgia was departing from its path of prudent fiscal policy. A reform of the corporate profit tax and increased infrastructure investment were driving expectations of a 6% of GDP budget deficit in 2017, endangering Georgia’s macroeconomic stability and its reputation with investors. After winning the elections, the “Georgian Dream” coalition has undertaken significant efforts towards keeping the budget deficit at bay. The deficit Read More
  • Access to Finance for Agricultural Cooperatives

    The Forum took place on 29 November 2016 in the framework of the EU-funded European Neighbourhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development (ENPARD) in order to discuss some the key challenges Georgia’s agricultural cooperatives face with regard to access to finance. Please see the conference programme and presentations (listed below). This was the fourth in a series of policy dialogues about agriculture and rural development organized by the CARE consortium, which Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Our Partners